无所不在的神，需要降临在已经存在的地方吗？

无所不在的神

各位是相信神是无所不在的，是充满万有的，为什么今天还是在自己骗自己说：“神的灵刚降临在祂已经存在的地方”。强调这种矛盾的说法是我们的共信，有意思吗？（诗篇139：7-8；以弗所书1：23）

神的灵是无所不在，换句话说，神的灵无时无刻的充满着万有。我们因为肉眼的局限，看不到那看不见的神的灵，却因信，相信那看不见的神的灵是充满着万有的。当神的灵决定要向人显现，有局限的人的肉眼，只能明明看到的是神的灵好像是在降临一般，那为什么我们还是停留在人肉眼的感观上，把我们已经认同神的灵是无所不在充满万有的显现，还是解释为“神的灵才刚刚降临，意思是说在之前神的灵並不在那个地方”呢？充满万有的神的灵，需要再降临在祂已经存在的地方吗？这么幼稚这么无知这么顽固这么矛盾的思想，要蒙骗我们自己到几时呢？我们肉眼看到神的灵，是无所不在的神的灵的显现，不是神的灵的降临，不是吗？

自有永有的神

各位也是相信神是自有永有的，换句话说我们也是相信神的灵也同时和神是自有永有的。那么我们又何必自己骗自己说：“人把主耶稣的肉身钉死在十字架上主耶稣的肉身是死了，那自有永有的神的灵也会因此而同时死去吗”？为什么老是以人的观点去理解圣灵的事呢？有 意思吗？为什么老是停留在自己的矛盾之中，而把神的作为以人的意思形容为一件矛盾的事呢？有意思吗？

如果神不道成肉身来到我们中间，如果主耶稣的肉身不死而复活，那神预定的救恩能完成吗？主耶稣的肉身，为了替我们赎罪，是明明死在十字架上。我们有何必与世人的无知和愚拙看齐，去争论“自有永有的神的灵”也会随着主耶稣的肉身死去呢？这样的自相矛盾有意思吗？

万象都是神的灵托住的，只要神的灵“不存在”了一分钟，不要说是三天，万有都歸无有了，我们还能在这里呱呱叫吗？不是吗？

以上两点是我们的共信吗？

如果你说是的，那么：

1.分分钟，我们都“浸在无所不在的神的灵”里面，不是吗？

2.分分钟，自有永有的神的灵，在五旬节前是存在的，在五旬节时是存在的，在五旬节後也是存在的，这自有永有的神的灵也同时充满着万有，不是吗？

3.在末世审判时，我们的灵都被提升，接受审判。义人的灵被接入天国里，恶者的灵被判下地狱，受那永不止尽火湖的火燃烧的刑法。连虫都不死，恶者的灵会被烧死吗？（马可9：44）神那时是会收回神的灵，你我看到的“万有”就都歸“无有”。

请别护卫和守住“断章取义”的说法

1.把五旬节圣灵的浸形容为主耶稣升天後第一次降临，意思是之前主耶稣的灵没有充满万有，主耶稣的灵不是无所不在的灵，单单这以上两点就可以证明教会的说法含有“断章取义”的错误。

2.只执行约翰福音13章主耶稣责骂彼得的一句话，却没有去执行主耶稣命令门徒要照榜样去行的命令；只行其一，不行其二，让外人看了，马上知道这也是“断章取义”的做法。

当初圣灵带领先贤创立真耶稣教会，不是要更正万教信仰吗？这不就是真耶稣教会的原有精神吗？但是如果我们研究圣经的真理，即使圣灵要感动我们，而我们却立意要固守成规，坚持己见，不理会神交托给我们真理的前后文，固执地只取一段经节中的一小段，断章取义地立下定论。在五大信仰里，有三项就存有这毛病。你说，真耶稣教会如何去更正万教呢？没有纯正的真理如何抵挡撒旦的攻击呢？如何推广福音呢？

觉悟已往所犯的错误，可能是一件使人震惊害怕的事，却不是一件可耻的事，除非你的骄傲使你拒绝修正理解错了的信念！

醒醒吧，我亲爱的教会！

God is omnipresent. Should omnipresent God descend to the place He is already there?

Omnipresent God

All of us believe that God is omnipresent and God fills all in all. Today, why do we still con ourselves by saying that “The Spirit of God has just descended to the place He has already present”? Emphasizing such contradicting belief as our common belief, is it meaningful? (Psalm 139:7-8; Ephesians 1:23)

God is omnipresent. In other words, the Spirit of God is omnipresent and fills all in all too.  Constrained by our human vision, we cannot see the invisible Spirit of God. But because of faith, we believe that the invisible Spirit of God is filling all in all. At the time the Spirit of God decided to show Himself, limited by our constrained vision, what we could visually see is clearly appeared as if the Spirit of God has just descended. But knowing the fact of our limitation, why should we hold back our understanding within the constraint of our senses? Why should we continue to ignore our common belief that the Spirit of God is omnipresent filling all in all? And still explain that “the Spirit of God has just descended, meaning that before the time, the Spirit of God was not present”? Is it meaningful that the omnipresent Spirit of God has to descend in the place where He has already presented? This kind of thinking is naïve, ignorant, stubborn and self-contradicting. How long are we going to con ourselves with such thinking? Our naked eyes see the Spirit of God. This is the omnipresent Spirit of God manifest Himself to us. It is not that the Spirit of God has descended, get it?

Self existing and ever existing God

All of us also believe that God is self-existing and ever-existing. In other words, we also believe that the Spirit of God is self-existing and ever-existing too. Therefore, why should we continue to con ourselves that “when man put the body of Lord Jesus on the cross and the body of Christ died on the cross, we deduce that the self-existing and ever-existing Spirit of God had died too”? Why we always applied human perspective to spiritual event? Does it make sense? Why should we stagnating in our self-contradicting thought and describe the spiritual event with human perspective and come out with a self-contradiction explanation? Is it meaningful?

If God did not become flesh and be amongst us, if Lord Jesus’ body-flesh did not die and resurrected, then how God’s predestined salvation could be achieved? Lord Jesus body-flesh died on the cross for our redemption of sin. Why should we be as ignorant and foolish as the world in debating that “the self-existing and ever-existing Spirit of God” would die together with the body-flesh of Lord Jesus Christ? Is it meaningful to sustain our self-contradiction?

The Spirit of God sustains all in all. The all in all will become non-existence even if the Spirit of God “disappeared for one second” let alone for three days. If the Spirit of God had really died with Christ you should not have seen any of us arguing aloud in this forum, isn’t it?

Are the above two facts our common belief?

If your answer is yes, then:

1. At all time, we are immersed in the omnipresent Spirit of God, isn’t it?

2. At all time, the self-existing and ever-existing Spirit of God existed before the Pentecost, existed at the Pentecost and also existed after the Pentecost till forever. At the same time, the self-existing and ever-existing Spirit of God fills all in all, isn’t it?

3. At the last judgment day, our spirit will be lifted and receive the judgment. The righteous one will be admitted into the Kingdom of God. The unrighteous one will be casted into hell receiving the punishment in the lake with everlasting flame. It is the place even the worm would not die. (MARK 9:44) How could you declare that the spirit of the unrighteous will die in hell? At the time, we know that God will withdraw His Spirit. You and I will witness the universe in existence will become none.

Please stop defending out of context interpretation

1. Declaring that the Holy Spirit Baptism at the Pentecost was the first time the Holy Spirit had descended which means that the Spirit of Christ was not omnipresent and did not fill all in all. Just base on the above two facts, it is adequate to prove that this is an out of context interpretation.

2. Only carry out the action where Lord Jesus scolded Peter in the book of John chapter 13, but omitted Lord Jesus’ command to follow His example; executing one and omitting the other, is obviously an out of context interpretation problem.

In the beginning Holy Spirit had led our earlier holy worker to establish TJC. Wasn’t it that TJC was supposed to correct all others’ incorrect beliefs? Wasn’t it that it was TJC’s original spirit? However, if we research the truths in the Bible, even if the Holy Spirit tries to move us and reveal to us, but if we insist with our pride and desire, and do not put into consideration the context before and after the passage under study, and stubbornly pick a passage out from a larger passage, and make an out of context conclusion, resulting in that out of the five common doctrines, there are three which were interpreted out of context. What say you? Can TJC correct the wrong beliefs of other churches? Without having the original truth from God, how could TJC defend against Satan’s attack? How could TJC spread the Gospel?

Realize past mistake maybe is a shocking and startling event but it is not a shameful event, unless your pride has overwhelmed you refusing to correct your wrong perception!

Please wake up, my dear church!